Tuesday, January 4, 2011

The Theoretical Yield For Benzocaine

decision of the G-BA for the development of a quality assurance process in hip


decision of the Federal Joint Committee commissioned a
the institution in accordance with § 137a SGB V:
developments for a quality assurance procedure in
Hüftendoprothesenversorgung
From 16 December 2010
The Federal Joint Committee at its meeting on 16th December 2010 was enacted following:
I. The institution under § 137 a SGB V in accordance with paragraphs 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 of Appendix 1.1 entrusted to "contract for services related to the quality of care in the health" of 28 August 2009, for a quality assurance procedure in
Hüftendoprothesenversorgung
• instruments and indicators and the necessary documentation •

develop.
In developing the current version of the paper methods of the institution pursuant to § 137 a SGB V is taken into account for selecting indicators and setting out the instruments.
II subject matter and scope of the assignment
The institution under § 137 a SGB V is charged with a comparative service-based and sector-wide quality assurance procedures to improve the quality of the endoprosthetic treatment (primary and revision surgery) of the hip and taking into account the existing procedures of the external hospital quality assurance and to develop the involvement of all relevant supply indications. 2
The contract includes the representation of realistic Practices based on the most important patient-relevant outcomes and the development of indicators and any representation of reference areas to measure the quality of care. In the development of instruments and indicators are particular points of interest: first
Background of the supply situation with the description of the power providers and patient population and the current technology endoprosthetic
second Description and discussion of various potential instruments and mechanisms for quality measurement (eg, sample / census, patient survey)
third Description of the procedure and implementation, involving a technical and resource-related, including adequate follow-ups Treatment outcomes, late complications and revisions
4th Review of the inclusion of follow-up treatment / rehabilitation measures measures
5th Consideration of sector crossings in the supply
6th Representation of the required documentation
7th Indications (history, clinical results, diagnosis)
8th Preoperative patient information and education (eg, information on post-operative course taking into account the individual medical and social situation, behavioral measures)
9th Examination of the IT technical means to integrate existing or under development Arthroplasty

III. Other commitments
is subject to compliance with the commission, and cooperation with the institution pursuant to § 137 a SGB V for them the first Section § 22 of the Rules of Procedure (Rules of Procedure). Here, the institution pursuant to § 137 a SGB V is after 1 Chapter § 20 VerfO particular, in first
to observe the rules of procedure, 2nd
to report periodically on the progress of, third
the bodies of the Joint National Committee for questions and comments during the processing of the order to be available and
3
4th subject to certain rules of procedure of the Federal Joint Committee confidentiality of discussions and consultation documents.
IV The commission is
commission for the year 2010.
V. deadline
The institution under § 137 a SGB V has to in point 2.5 of Annex 1.11bis 20th submitted in January 2012 the G-BA, the indicators and tools and the results to document the opinions of the parties. It has used a final report on the current development effort will be attached to the first they
the outcome of their development work summarizes
second articulating what research she has done with what results, third
the evidence on which it is called experts, and evaluating their designs, fourth
comments on whether and why they all suggestions and concerns 137a of the parties to the Section § 3 SGB V were expressed did not include in their results,
5th lists, which literature and other sources has used them, and prove that it took into account all relevant studies.
The period within which the G-BA may require repairs or a new development starts earlier than the designated as the deadline day.
Berlin, 16 December 2010
Federal Joint Committee in accordance with § 91 SGB V
The Chairman
Hess

The original document can be found here .

0 comments:

Post a Comment